Transparency · Evidence · Impact

Quality and evidence: making SchadenNetzwerk verifiable.

This page openly documents the evidence SchadenNetzwerk already provides and the independent validation still being prepared. Awards are named only after genuine recognition.

Direct answer Trust comes from a clear problem, a traceable solution, tested user quality and measurable impact — not from adding a badge.

Already implemented

  • German and English with German as the default and consistent hreflang references
  • one central accident-help route in nine languages
  • named methodology, transparent metrics and structured data
  • local fonts, security rules, unique pages and clear user journeys

Independent evidence still required

  1. Two anonymised case studies with baseline, intervention and predefined before/after metrics.
  2. Three to five approved testimonials with name, role and company.
  3. 28 days of real Core Web Vitals data and a documented WCAG 2.2 AA audit.
  4. A 60–90 second product video with captions, transcript and anonymised product views.
  5. Independent references from trade media, associations, academia or credible industry partners.

90-day plan

Days 1–30: collect evidence and consent. Days 31–60: produce case studies, video, accessibility and performance records. Days 61–90: complete submission narrative, imagery, jury demo and independent review.

Continuous improvement and external review

B2B software, service design, digital process, automotive innovation, user experience and responsible digital transformation. Specific award names and logos are used only after checking entry rules or receiving a genuine award.

Would you like to evaluate the product yourself?

See the portal live